Reform Financing

Verification Is Strategy, Not Paperwork

In results-based financing, a state can achieve reform and still lose disbursement. The difference is rarely about performance. It is almost always about verification readiness.

Something we have observed repeatedly in supporting Nigerian states through results-based financing assessments. A state can implement a reform thoroughly — and still lose disbursement. Not because the assessment was wrong. Because verification readiness was treated as an administrative task rather than a strategic discipline.

The Core InsightA state that achieves 80% of a reform with 100% verification readiness will outperform a state that achieves 100% of a reform with inadequate documentation and misaligned protocols. Verification is a parallel discipline — and it has to be managed as one.

Three Things Determine Disbursement

What was achieved. How well it was documented. And how strategically that documentation maps to Independent Verification Agent protocols. Most programmes invest heavily in the first — and almost nothing in the second and third.

The Verification Intelligence Framework

Our approach treats IVA engagement as a strategic system running from Day 1. Decode protocols before you build evidence. Design reforms so documentation is a natural institutional output. Maintain real-time disbursement indicator tracking dashboards. Build cross-agency evidence coordination before assessment season. And develop the capability to respond formally when determinations are contested.

"The single most significant determinant of disbursement outcomes is not the quality of reforms implemented. It is the quality of verification architecture built around them."
The Switch Briefing

Our thinking, quarterly

Governance, reform financing, and institutional analysis — written by the people doing the work.